Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearFlow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ClearFlow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Reliable sources do not talk about this company in-depth and most news hits are press releases. Also, COI/paid editing issues exist. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retained blood syndrome, which is related to this. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)(edited to add other AFD 05:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Jytdog (talk) 05:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete. per nom. The article looked like this earlier today. Jytdog (talk) 05:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete Non-notable manufacturer, obvious COI issues in past edits. Famous _dog (c) 10:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. Undisclosed paid editing is a blight on our project. --RexxS (talk) 12:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed with those above. Excluded by WP:NOTSPAM Notability also not established in sourcing when read in light of the relevant guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as paid for undisclosed spam. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.